Skip to content
68

stim free pre workout

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 89Growth 23Conversion 52Competition 63Returns 100Price range 94Avg price 95Brand share 56Review moat 70Quality gap 73

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$35.87

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$14.69–$56.89

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Great$1.7M

$1.7M/yr · 1.1M searches

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good681.94

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Good47%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good71%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Good4.3%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-4.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 47% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

32

Top-5 brand share

71%

Open market

22%

  • RAW22%
  • ProSupps15%
  • Transparent Labs14%
  • Nutricost12%
  • Jacked Factory8%
  • GHOST7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$67K8%$135K12%$202K16%$269K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 33 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
30K20KPrime Day '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall23%

“Tastes yummy too”

Flavor12%

“the flavor is mild”

Quality-Overall9%

“Overall good contents”

Energy Level6%

“EXCELLENT sustained energy”

Value For Money5%

“Great value”

Caffeine Content4%

“Caffeine free”

Efficiency3%

“Its very effective for the pump”

Focus Enhancement3%

“Really good focus”

Solubility2%

“Dissolves easily”

Strength2%

“Effective”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall12%

“had a weird aftertaste”

Allergies8%

“Caused rash”

Side Effects7%

“it makes me nauseous”

Value For Money5%

“Buy cheaper”

Flavor4%

“The peach mango flavor tastes disgusting and artificial”

Functionality-Overall4%

“Not effective”

Quality-Overall3%

“Bad quality”

Acid Regulator/Stomach Ache Relief3%

“upset stomach problem”

Energy Level2%

“No boost of energy”

Sour2%

“This sour watermelon flavor, however, is truly vile”

Top return reasons

Flavor12%
Hard Feel8%
Quality-Overall8%
Functionality-Overall8%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Strength6%
Sensitivity-Overall6%
Sour4%
Artificial Sweeteners4%
Leak-Proof4%