Skip to content
51

smoothie add ins

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a small market ($61K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 15Growth 28Conversion 23Competition 75Returns 100Price range 84Avg price 89Brand share 60Review moat 21Quality gap 48

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$20.69

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$8.17–$56.36

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good40%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Good69%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+2.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad1.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Bad10,526.24

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad$61K

$61K/yr · 163K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 40% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

24 falling

Sellers

668

Top-5 brand share

69%

Open market

27%

  • Orgain35%
  • BetterBody Foods15%
  • Concord Foods7%
  • NGU Next Gen U7%
  • Country Farms6%
  • Kate Naturals4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$2K8%$5K12%$7K16%$10K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 38 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +2.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
5K4KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall24%

“Delicious and healthy”

Nutritional Content14%

“Good nutrition”

Quality-Overall11%

“EXCELLENT Product”

Flavor7%

“Balanced flavor”

Value For Money4%

“Good value for money”

Solubility3%

“Mixes easily”

Blend/Ratio3%

“Blends well”

Vegan/Organic2%

“It is Vegan”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy Peezy”

Ingredients-Overall2%

“Excellent Ingredients”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall25%

“Chalky taste”

Flavor7%

“Bad flavor”

Value For Money7%

“Too expensive”

Sweetness4%

“I found it to be significantly sweeter than expected”

Nutritional Content4%

“there's no significant nutritional value whatsoever”

Size-Overall3%

“Bag smaller than expected”

Smell2%

“It smells disgusting”

Ease Of Use2%

“difficult to use”

Texture/Consistency-Overall2%

“had gritty texture that I couldnt tolerate”

Solubility2%

“Does not dissolve well”

Top return reasons

Taste-Overall23%
Size-Overall17%
Value For Money13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Ingredients-Overall5%
Smell4%
Artificial Sweeteners4%
Flavor3%
Sour2%
Product Condition2%