Skip to content
48

selenite

Skip it

Soft demand (-14.6% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 37Growth 18Conversion 52Competition 45Returns 88Price range 66Avg price 48Brand share 71Review moat 71Quality gap 27

Returns

Great1.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Good62%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Good653.56

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good$5.26–$34.32

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good4.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Okay$11.81

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay$184K

$184K/yr · 371K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-14.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

29

Top-5 brand share

62%

Open market

31%

  • MINERALUNIVERSE22%
  • New Age Imports, Inc.17%
  • Runyangshi9%
  • AD Beads8%
  • MAIBAOTA7%
  • Pachamama Essentials7%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$18K20%$37K30%$55K40%$73K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -14.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KHoliday '24Spike '25Holiday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall22%

“Fits perfectly”

Quality-Overall15%

“Good quality stones”

Advertised Vs Actual Product12%

“As described”

Value For Money8%

“Definitely worth the price”

Charging7%

“perfect for charging”

Minerals3%

“Cool looking crystals”

Design-Overall3%

“The design on it is beautiful”

Thickness3%

“Thickness is great”

Strength2%

“Solid piece”

Brightness/Shine/Glow2%

“However, the bracelet itself is in good condition, with a nice weight and shine”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall38%

“it is BIG”

Thickness9%

“Very thick”

Value For Money5%

“Not worth the price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“selenite can't be carved into beads- falsely advertised”

Flatness5%

“Note that this is a flat piece”

Thin3%

“Too thin”

Quality-Overall3%

“Poor quality”

Color3%

“it looks awful on it because of the brown streak”

Material Quality3%

“This feels like plastic: texture, weight, temperature”

Hard Feel3%

“very rough”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall43%
Advertised Vs Actual Product14%
Defective Material/Parts9%
Quality-Overall7%
Wrist Fit5%
Thin2%
Value For Money2%
Precious Gemstone2%
Hard Feel2%
Thickness2%