Skip to content
52

regular pads

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 70Growth 38Conversion 81Competition 47Returns 99Price range 70Avg price 64Brand share 0Review moat 23Quality gap 33

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great8.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good$725K

$725K/yr · 621K searches

Price range

Good$4.85–$39.24

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Good$13.71

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Okay57%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+10.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad8,595.32

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 57% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

5 flat

Sellers

102

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Stayfree57%
  • Amazon Basics28%
  • Carefree10%
  • Always4%
  • Generic1%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$73K20%$145K30%$218K40%$290K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 28 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +10.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KPrime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money21%

“Great Deal”

Quality-Overall16%

“Great quality and dependable performance”

Comfort-Overall9%

“Comfortable and durable”

Absorbency8%

“Very absorbent”

Size-Overall5%

“Fit nicely”

Leak-Proof4%

“never leak”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“As advertised”

Thickness3%

“thick”

Durability2%

“Durability is great”

Soft Feel2%

“Soft, absorbent”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness13%

“Adhesive not good at all”

Thickness10%

“Not thick”

Size-Overall8%

“Its small”

Quality-Overall8%

“quality kinda feels cheap”

Absorbency8%

“Not absorbent”

Leak-Proof5%

“they leak”

Value For Money4%

“Price high”

Allergies4%

“Irritating”

Smell3%

“These had a chemical smell when I opened them”

Durability3%

“EVERY SINGLE ONE FELL APART”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall43%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Thin8%
Thickness8%
Absorbency7%
Adhesion/Stickiness4%
Value For Money3%
Comfort-Overall3%
Smell2%
Quality-Overall2%