Skip to content
70

protein gummies

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 74Growth 23Conversion 54Competition 76Returns 100Price range 91Avg price 95Brand share 86Review moat 75Quality gap 76

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$30.70

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$12.45–$62.02

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Great49%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Competition

Great39%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Great494.03

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good$831K

$831K/yr · 606K searches

Conversion

Good4.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-4.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (39% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

29 rising

Sellers

67

Top-5 brand share

49%

Open market

45%

  • OAKA15%
  • Totaria11%
  • KR Labs10%
  • Veyuxiiwa7%
  • FUELE+7%
  • ZYGCDZ6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$25K6%$50K9%$75K12%$100K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 40 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -4.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall34%

“Yummy gummies”

Nutritional Content12%

“Easy nutrition”

Flavor6%

“flavor is very tasty”

Vitamin6%

“Great tasting vitamins”

Quality-Overall5%

“Solid product quality”

Ease Of Use4%

“Easy and quick to use”

Sweetness3%

“Sugar free”

Energy Level2%

“Boost of energy”

Regulates Digestion2%

“Definitely helps with constipation”

Ease Of Chewing/Swallowing2%

“soft and chewy”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall17%

“Bland taste”

Value For Money14%

“very costly”

Nutritional Content7%

“which has 0 nutritional value somehow”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Deceptive advertising”

Flavor2%

“the flavor is a bit artificial”

Texture/Consistency-Overall2%

“The texture is off”

Sweetness2%

“Low sugar”

Artificial Sweeteners2%

“Unfortunately, they are not naturally sweetened”

Vitamin1%

“Cant make a vitamin taste like a candy gummy”

Quality-Overall1%

“Absolutely terrible product”

Top return reasons

Taste-Overall29%
Leak-Proof11%
Flavor9%
Nutritional Content8%
Ingredients-Overall4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Stale/Rotten/Spoiled3%
Sour3%
Smell3%
Value For Money3%