Skip to content
55

protein gel

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 96Growth 28Conversion 87Competition 7Returns 99Price range 95Avg price 94Brand share 0Review moat 50Quality gap 48

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Incredible$2.8M

$2.8M/yr · 606K searches

Price range

Incredible$34.12–$64.45

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great$46.96

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great9.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Review moat

Good1,485.57

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Okay+2.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad91%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 91% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

3 flat

Sellers

16

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Frog Fuel86%
  • LiquaCel9%
  • ProT Gold5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%$424K30%$849K45%$1.3M60%$1.7M101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 7 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 31 weeks — +2.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSpike '26Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Nutritional Content20%

“Nutritional Powerhouse”

Taste-Overall16%

“No strange aftertaste”

Quality-Overall11%

“High quality and great tasting”

Ease Of Use10%

“Easy to take”

Energy Level3%

“Love this product tast great energy level awsom good value”

Flavor3%

“Great flavor”

Joint Pain3%

“Recovery & Joint pain Must Have”

Efficiency2%

“Frog fuel works great”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“it does its job”

Value For Money2%

“Worth every penny”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall34%

“They tasted like chemicals”

Value For Money6%

“Expensive”

Flavor6%

“Cant do the flavor”

Nutritional Content3%

“Wish it had more protein and was cheaper”

Quality-Overall2%

“There needs to be better quality control”

Sweetness2%

“The flavor is a little on the sweet side”

Acid Regulator/Stomach Ache Relief2%

“He had stomach issues”

Sour2%

“Extremely sour”

Contamination2%

“Each box arrived with spoiled or contaminated”

Ease Of Chewing/Swallowing2%

“throw up in your mouth a little”

Top return reasons

Taste-Overall28%
Leak-Proof14%
Flavor11%
Nutritional Content8%
Ingredients-Overall4%
Smell3%
Advertised Vs Actual Product3%
Contamination3%
Stale/Rotten/Spoiled3%
Sour3%