Skip to content
55

pre workout gummies

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but soft demand (-31.4% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 57Growth 9Conversion 50Competition 27Returns 100Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 44Review moat 68Quality gap 86

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$35.33

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible$21.56–$56.48

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good776.44

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Good$447K

$447K/yr · 320K searches

Conversion

Okay4.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay79%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay69%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-31.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 69% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

13 flat

Sellers

36

Top-5 brand share

79%

Open market

16%

  • EHP Labs46%
  • REDCON111%
  • Bounce Pro10%
  • Cytona6%
  • TASTY GAINS5%
  • Bloom Nutrition5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (7 brands, 16%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$45K20%$89K30%$134K40%$179K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 103 weeks — -31.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
60K40KSpike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25Spike '26DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall35%

“Tastes great and are effective”

Flavor8%

“The flavor was completely unexpected”

Quality-Overall8%

“Excellent Product”

Energy Level7%

“Amazing energy”

Ease Of Use6%

“easy to open”

Nutritional Content3%

“A simple, effective supplement”

Value For Money2%

“Reasonable price”

Weight Loss2%

“they've helped my metabolism burn fat”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Just as advertised”

Efficiency2%

“Works well”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall23%

“Does not taste good”

Value For Money9%

“Too expensive”

Flavor6%

“Bad flavor”

Functionality-Overall5%

“It did not produce the results it said it would for me”

Energy Level4%

“Doesnt give any energy”

Weight Loss3%

“No big weight loss yet”

Hard Feel3%

“Super hard”

Texture/Consistency-Overall2%

“have an absolutely horrible texture”

Dosage2%

“Their amounts for daily serving is lower than the standard suggested ones, respectively”

Side Effects2%

“We all had bloating and felt queasy”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall28%
Taste-Overall28%
Ingredients-Overall11%
Advertised Vs Actual Product11%
Flavor11%
Stuck/Fused Together6%
Hard Feel6%