Skip to content
46

potty mints

Skip it

Soft demand (-15.4% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 25Growth 17Conversion 74Competition 17Returns 98Price range 67Avg price 79Brand share 23Review moat 40Quality gap 88

Returns

Incredible0.5%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Great4.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great$16.68

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good$10.59–$23.91

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Okay2,531.3

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad$100K

$100K/yr · 87K searches

Brand share

Bad91%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Growth

Bad-15.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad80%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Competition

The top 5 products capture 80% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

7 rising

Sellers

13

Top-5 brand share

91%

Open market

4%

  • Poo-Pourri53%
  • DUDE Wipes14%
  • POTTY MINTS11%
  • Never There7%
  • Sheet Happens6%
  • Plop Star5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 4%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%$15K30%$30K45%$45K60%$60K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 10 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 31 weeks — -15.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '26Dec '25Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell35%

“Smelling Great”

Ease Of Use9%

“Easy to use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“It works as advertised”

Spray/Flow6%

“Better than sprays”

Quality-Overall6%

“Quality: Good quality tablets”

Value For Money5%

“Good price”

Ease Of Cleaning4%

“Clean as Can Be”

Efficiency4%

“Works well”

Portability3%

“are very portable for traveling”

Strength2%

“Effective”

What buyers complain about

Smell43%

“No smell”

Functionality-Overall9%

“does not work as intended”

Value For Money7%

“a tad expensive”

Ease Of Use4%

“need to be easier to open”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Not as advertised”

Ease Of Cleaning3%

“Zero cleaning and barely any scent”

Residue2%

“then leave a slight blue residue”

Spray/Flow2%

“Does not work as well as the spray”

Size-Overall2%

“Small”

Solubility1%

“No, these are a dissolving tablet”

Top return reasons

Smell45%
Functionality-Overall17%
Advertised Vs Actual Product15%
Size-Overall4%
Value For Money2%
Stain Resistance2%
Product Condition1%
Ease Of Cleaning1%
Leak-Proof1%
Compatibility-Overall1%