Skip to content
42

poop drops for toilet

Skip it

A small market ($33K/yr) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 8Growth 28Conversion 79Competition 23Returns 98Price range 58Avg price 64Brand share 16Review moat 22Quality gap 65

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great8.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Good$13.70

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$7.96–$24.69

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Okay+2.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Review moat

Bad10,394.28

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad94%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Market size

Bad$33K

$33K/yr · 30K searches

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

8 falling

Sellers

50

Top-5 brand share

94%

Open market

3%

  • Just A Drop67%
  • Kobayashi11%
  • Poo-Pourri5%
  • Fresh Drop5%
  • Sawaday5%
  • Prelam3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 3%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$3K20%$7K30%$10K40%$13K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 18 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 43 weeks — +2.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '25Holiday '25Spike '26Sep '25Nov '25Dec '25Feb '26Mar '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell42%

“Best smell”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“As advertised”

Efficiency6%

“Effective to a large extent”

Quality-Overall5%

“Overall, its a great product in terms of performance,”

Size-Overall5%

“Size is good”

Spray/Flow4%

“Much easier than the sprays”

Value For Money3%

“Worth it”

Portability3%

“Easily portable”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy Peasy”

Ease Of Cleaning2%

“helps keep bowl clean”

What buyers complain about

Smell41%

“They smell weird”

Value For Money9%

“The only thing I don't like about this is the price”

Leak-Proof7%

“Leaking bottle”

Functionality-Overall6%

“These things do not work as well as the spray”

Size-Overall4%

“it is small”

Durability3%

“However the spray mechanism broke within 3 uses”

Spray/Flow3%

“Does not work as well as the spray”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“just not the same”

Ease Of Use2%

“Item was difficult to use”

Ease Of Cleaning2%

“I did not notice it making anything cleaner”

Top return reasons

Smell35%
Leak-Proof23%
Functionality-Overall8%
Size-Overall6%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Value For Money5%
Spray/Flow4%
Product Condition3%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Motor Power2%