Skip to content
52

poop drops

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.3%), but a small market ($75K/yr) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 19Growth 34Conversion 78Competition 59Returns 98Price range 60Avg price 63Brand share 47Review moat 22Quality gap 58

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great7.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good$13.50

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$3.66–$31.74

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good50%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Okay77%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Growth

Okay+7.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad10,188.53

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad$75K

$75K/yr · 71K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 50% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

17 falling

Sellers

101

Top-5 brand share

77%

Open market

17%

  • Just A Drop32%
  • Kobayashi14%
  • Poo-Pourri11%
  • Fresh Drop11%
  • Sawaday7%
  • Scrubbing Bubbles6%
  • Open — no brand owns it (11 brands, 17%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$3K8%$6K12%$9K16%$12K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 36 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 10 weeks — +7.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KSpike '26May '26May '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jul '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell19%

“Great fragrance”

Ease Of Cleaning14%

“Cleans Great”

Quality-Overall10%

“Quality: Good quality tablets”

Efficiency8%

“Work effectively”

Value For Money7%

“Very affordable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As advertised”

Ease Of Use5%

“it's easy to open”

Color3%

“Long lasting color”

Size-Overall3%

“Convenient size”

Portability2%

“It is portable”

What buyers complain about

Smell22%

“Strong odor”

Durability8%

“Half were broken”

Ease Of Cleaning7%

“Does not clean”

Functionality-Overall7%

“This is not functional”

Color5%

“when the blue color faded”

Value For Money4%

“Not worth it”

Size-Overall4%

“Inconsistent Size - not as advertised”

Stain Resistance4%

“Blue stains”

Leak-Proof3%

“Leaked”

Spray/Flow2%

“DOES NOT SPRAY”

Top return reasons

Smell29%
Leak-Proof19%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Functionality-Overall7%
Size-Overall6%
Value For Money5%
Spray/Flow4%
Color4%
Product Condition2%
Stain Resistance2%