Skip to content
59

plug in refills

Worth a look

Shows a $11.8M/yr market, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 100Growth 25Conversion 95Competition 83Returns 98Price range 43Avg price 61Brand share 0Review moat 17Quality gap 22

Market size

Incredible$11.8M

$11.8M/yr · 7.1M searches

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible12.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Great32%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Avg price

Good$13.35

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Okay$1.90–$24.89

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Bad-1.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad19,592.3

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (32% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

3 flat

Sellers

157

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Glade75%
  • Air Wick24%
  • SC Johnson Professional1%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$354K6%$708K9%$1.1M12%$1.4M101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 63 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -1.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
400K300KPrime Day '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.0×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell61%

“Smells clean”

Value For Money7%

“Decent price”

Quality-Overall4%

“The product works really well”

Ease Of Use3%

“Easy Use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“As Advertised”

Durability2%

“don't really seem to break”

Freshness2%

“instantly make any room feel fresher”

Efficiency2%

“efficient”

Assembly/Installation1%

“Easy to assemble”

Size-Overall1%

“the bottle fits perfectly”

What buyers complain about

Smell37%

“Can't smell anything”

Durability9%

“Did not last”

Functionality-Overall8%

“Barely works”

Value For Money6%

“A little expensive”

Leak-Proof5%

“Bottle leakage”

Quality-Overall2%

“Poor quality control”

Battery Life2%

“supplied batteries are no good”

Size-Overall2%

“The bottles are small”

Strength2%

“a little strong at first”

Advertised Vs Actual Product1%

“Not as expected”

Top return reasons

Smell50%
Size-Overall12%
Functionality-Overall8%
Leak-Proof7%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Compatibility-Overall4%
Value For Money3%
Dispensing Mechanism1%
Product Condition1%
Durability1%