Skip to content
56

permetrina en crema para la sarna humana

Launch it

A $2.4M/yr market growing +9.7% this quarter with returns at 0.4% — clears our launch bar.

Market size 95Growth 37Conversion 99Competition 30Returns 98Price range 85Avg price 85Brand share 0Review moat 24Quality gap 23

Conversion

Incredible18.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Incredible$2.4M

$2.4M/yr · 704K searches

Avg price

Great$18.98

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$9.15–$58.05

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Okay+9.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Okay67%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Bad5,569.79

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 67% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

3 flat

Sellers

32

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Sarna52%
  • CeraVe38%
  • SARNA BASEBALL10%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$242K20%$484K30%$727K40%$969K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 14 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +9.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
20K15KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Allergies19%

“No irritation”

Quality-Overall15%

“Excellent Product”

Moist/Dry10%

“Good moisturizing cream”

Efficiency10%

“Effective”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Exactly what I wanted”

Value For Money4%

“Not to expensive”

Soft Feel4%

“Smooth on skin”

Absorbency3%

“Absorbs well”

Suitability Dry Skin2%

“It seems to do a good job of fighting winter dry skin”

Smell2%

“fragrance free”

What buyers complain about

Allergies25%

“My skin gets irritated”

Functionality-Overall11%

“The pump does not work”

Motor Power5%

“Defective pump”

Value For Money5%

“Waste of Money”

Product Condition4%

“It looked like it had been used”

Thickness3%

“It is not this thick cream-like stuff that are in some brands”

Dispensing Mechanism3%

“Great Product - Horrible Dispenser”

Moist/Dry3%

“very dry”

Smell3%

“Smells weird”

Ease Of Use3%

“It is very hard to use”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall17%
Product Condition15%
Motor Power11%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Leak-Proof8%
Size-Overall7%
Value For Money6%
Smell4%
Defective Material/Parts3%
Ingredients-Overall3%