Skip to content
43

ovulos de clotrimazol

Skip it

A small market ($42K/yr) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 11Growth 23Conversion 55Competition 49Returns 100Price range 50Avg price 65Brand share 55Review moat 25Quality gap 25

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Good$13.76

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Good4.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Good72%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Good$4.62–$25.19

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay56%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad4,872.9

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-3.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$42K

$42K/yr · 67K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 56% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

16 rising

Sellers

79

Top-5 brand share

72%

Open market

23%

  • Monistat25%
  • Clotrimazole21%
  • Boiron14%
  • Terramed Just Think Comfort7%
  • O Positiv6%
  • Gyne-Lotrimin5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$2K8%$3K12%$5K16%$7K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 10 weeks — -3.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K1KMay '26May '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jun '26Jul '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall17%

“the quality of the product feels reliable”

Efficiency14%

“Works Well”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“Worked as stated”

Value For Money8%

“For the price”

Ease Of Use7%

“The capsules are easy to use”

Allergies4%

“no irritation at all”

Smell4%

“it works well got me smelling so clean”

Itch Relief4%

“Great for jock itch”

Ease Of Application2%

“The application was simple”

Side Effects2%

“Absolutely zero burning effect”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall13%

“Did not work”

Allergies13%

“Allergic Reaction”

Pain Relief-Overall9%

“Incredibly painful”

Smell5%

“Smells like gasoline”

Itch Relief5%

“does not relieve itching”

Leak-Proof4%

“Had a little tingle at first makes you leak”

Comfort-Overall3%

“Very uncomfortable”

Burnt/Roasted/Overbaked3%

“BEWARE -- severe burning”

Side Effects3%

“immediately regretted using this product”

Value For Money2%

“Pricey”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product28%
Functionality-Overall23%
Leak-Proof5%
Value For Money5%
Dispensing Mechanism5%
Side Effects3%
Size-Overall3%
Product Condition3%
Joint Pain3%
Quality-Overall3%