Skip to content
52

organic frankincense essential oil

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.8%), but soft demand (-11.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 42Growth 19Conversion 78Competition 46Returns 96Price range 70Avg price 74Brand share 65Review moat 25Quality gap 40

Returns

Incredible0.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great7.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good$14.87

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$8.91–$28.95

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good66%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay58%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay$219K

$219K/yr · 187K searches

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad4,799.05

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-11.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 58% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

18 rising

Sellers

31

Top-5 brand share

66%

Open market

26%

  • Carno Calm18%
  • Majestic Pure15%
  • Cliganic13%
  • Handcraft Blends10%
  • Nexon Botanics10%
  • US Organic8%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$11K10%$22K15%$33K20%$44K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -11.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
8K6KHoliday '24Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell27%

“Good smell”

Quality-Overall27%

“Excellent Product”

Value For Money7%

“Good price”

Efficiency5%

“Effective”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“As Advertised”

Soft Feel2%

“Smooths the skin well”

Vegan/Organic2%

“Pure and natural”

Moist/Dry2%

“This is a good deep moisturizer”

Ease Of Use2%

“It was easy to use”

Oily/Greasy2%

“Very pure oil”

What buyers complain about

Smell50%

“Strong odor”

Functionality-Overall6%

“Did not help”

Value For Money4%

“Waste of money”

Leak-Proof4%

“Leaking upon arrival”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Deceiving”

Size-Overall2%

“Dropper doesn't fit”

Quality-Overall2%

“Terrible product”

Oily/Greasy2%

“I was afraid it was going to be greasy”

Dilute/Watery2%

“Diluted”

Strength1%

“Its not to strong”

Top return reasons

Smell56%
Advertised Vs Actual Product11%
Leak-Proof6%
Functionality-Overall5%
Size-Overall4%
Oily/Greasy2%
Quality-Overall2%
Value For Money2%
Dilute/Watery1%
Defective Material/Parts1%