Skip to content
51

one touch ultra 2 glucose meter

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 99% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 82Growth 19Conversion 70Competition 23Returns 97Price range 89Avg price 95Brand share 3Review moat 27Quality gap 43

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$36.20

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$8.97–$88.07

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Great$1.3M

$1.3M/yr · 545K searches

Conversion

Good6.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay3,835.72

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Growth

Bad-11.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad99%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

6 flat

Sellers

62

Top-5 brand share

99%

Open market

0%

  • OneTouch67%
  • TruePoint14%
  • Lifescan10%
  • Generic7%
  • Ascensia1%
  • PRODIGY1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$127K20%$254K30%$381K40%$509K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 18 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -11.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money22%

“Decent price”

Quality-Overall20%

“Well made and reliable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product18%

“As Advertised”

Ease Of Use10%

“Easy to use”

Blood Sugar Level6%

“Best Diabetic Strips Ever”

Efficiency5%

“Works perfectly”

Accuracy-Overall4%

“Very Accurate”

Compatibility-Overall2%

“They work and are compatible”

Size-Overall1%

“Just as described to fit the Contour Nexgen”

Functionality-Overall1%

“Meter works ok I think”

What buyers complain about

Value For Money12%

“They are pricey”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy11%

“Wrong readings”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“False advertising, bad deal”

Functionality-Overall10%

“1 did not even turn on”

Blood Sugar Level7%

“I had symptoms of low sugar”

Quality-Overall6%

“Poor quality”

Compatibility-Overall5%

“It turns out that even though it was supposed to be compatible with my meter,it won't work because my meter is too old”

Battery Life4%

“Bad battery”

Product Condition4%

“Dont know if this product was refurbished or not”

Accuracy-Overall3%

“These testing strips are not very accurate”

Top return reasons

Compatibility-Overall37%
Size-Overall15%
Advertised Vs Actual Product12%
Functionality-Overall12%
Measurement/Reading Accuracy7%
Blood Sugar Level6%
Value For Money3%
Certifications2%
Product Condition1%
Accuracy-Overall1%