Skip to content
54

one touch ultra 2

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.7%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 98% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 86Growth 19Conversion 66Competition 41Returns 97Price range 89Avg price 95Brand share 4Review moat 30Quality gap 43

Returns

Incredible0.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$37.13

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$8.97–$88.07

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Great$1.5M

$1.5M/yr · 671K searches

Conversion

Good5.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay60%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay3,456.29

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-12.0%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad98%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 60% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

7 falling

Sellers

64

Top-5 brand share

98%

Open market

1%

  • OneTouch73%
  • TruePoint11%
  • Lifescan8%
  • Generic5%
  • Verio-Flex1%
  • Ascensia1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (1 brand, 1%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$74K10%$148K15%$222K20%$297K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 21 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -12.0% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KSpike '24Black Friday '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 5.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money20%

“Decent price”

Quality-Overall19%

“Well made and reliable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product17%

“As Advertised”

Ease Of Use10%

“Easy to use and accurate”

Blood Sugar Level6%

“Best Diabetic Strips Ever”

Accuracy-Overall5%

“Easy and accurate”

Efficiency5%

“Works as it should”

Compatibility-Overall2%

“They work and are compatible”

Functionality-Overall1%

“Meter works ok I think”

Size-Overall1%

“Just as described to fit the Contour Nexgen”

What buyers complain about

Advertised Vs Actual Product11%

“of false advertisement”

Functionality-Overall10%

“Test strips do not work”

Value For Money10%

“Too expensive”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy9%

“the meter would not give him a reading”

Blood Sugar Level6%

“I had symptoms of low sugar”

Quality-Overall6%

“Poor quality”

Battery Life4%

“Bad battery”

Compatibility-Overall4%

“Second, they gave me the wrong testing strips that are incompatible with the unit”

Charging3%

“wont hold a charge”

Accuracy-Overall3%

“Inaccurate results”

Top return reasons

Compatibility-Overall34%
Size-Overall14%
Functionality-Overall13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product12%
Measurement/Reading Accuracy9%
Blood Sugar Level6%
Value For Money4%
Certifications2%
Accuracy-Overall1%
Product Condition1%