Skip to content
51

oasis tears plus

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (24.5% search→purchase), but a concentrated shelf (top 5 take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 90Growth 21Conversion 100Competition 0Returns 99Price range 95Avg price 94Brand share 0Review moat 48Quality gap 23

Conversion

Incredible24.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Price range

Incredible$21.13–$24.31

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Great$22.77

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Great$1.7M

$1.7M/yr · 307K searches

Review moat

Okay1,679.75

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-7.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad100%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 100% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

1 flat

Sellers

13

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Oasis TEARS100%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%$257K30%$515K45%$772K60%$1.0M1001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 4 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -7.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KSpike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Eye-Hygiene27%

“Great dry eye product”

Quality-Overall17%

“The drops are very good”

Moist/Dry13%

“Great for dry eyes”

Value For Money5%

“They are worth every penney”

Efficiency4%

“Works well”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“As advertised”

Comfort-Overall3%

“comfortable”

Soothing Effect2%

“Soothing and lasts a few hours”

Ease Of Use2%

“very easy to use and very effective”

Lubrication2%

“The lubricant is really smooth”

What buyers complain about

Ease Of Use21%

“Its ridiculously hard to use”

Value For Money19%

“It's a bit expensive”

Dispensing Mechanism6%

“Very poor dispenser”

Moist/Dry5%

“Dont buy visited or murine they dry out your eyes”

Natural Resource Wastage4%

“Wasteful”

Design-Overall4%

“But the dropper design is absolutely terrible”

Hard Feel4%

“this bottle is too hard”

Flatness3%

“This flat thing with the blue dot doesn't work”

Product Condition2%

“Damaged and used product”

Allergies2%

“Eye irritation”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product27%
Moist/Dry11%
Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting7%
Stain Resistance7%
Oily/Greasy5%
Functionality-Overall5%
Thickness5%
Skin Health5%
Value For Money3%
Safety Standards3%