Skip to content
56

nutricost whey protein isolate

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 74Growth 49Conversion 64Competition 51Returns 100Price range 58Avg price 91Brand share 0Review moat 22Quality gap 55

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$56.37

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good$817K

$817K/yr · 256K searches

Conversion

Good5.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Good$18.80–$159.52

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good55%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+19.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad9,234.56

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 55% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

3 falling

Sellers

37

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Isopure52%
  • Nutricost46%
  • Dymatize1%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$41K10%$82K15%$123K20%$163K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 27 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 98 weeks — +19.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Nutritional Content21%

“GREAT Protein powder”

Taste-Overall17%

“This tastes AMAZING”

Quality-Overall9%

“Overall, it offers a great balance of price, quality, and size”

Flavor9%

“Unique flavor”

Solubility6%

“Dissolves easily”

Value For Money5%

“Great deal”

Blend/Ratio4%

“Great mixing”

Sweetness2%

“zero or very few sugars”

Texture/Consistency-Overall1%

“Pleasant taste & texture”

Advertised Vs Actual Product1%

“As advertised”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall16%

“gross taste”

Value For Money13%

“Priced to high”

Flavor9%

“its unflavored”

Solubility6%

“Does not mix well”

Nutritional Content4%

“Inconsistency in the nutrition facts”

Sweetness2%

“Vanilla tastes too sugary to me”

Texture/Consistency-Overall2%

“Chalky Texture”

Artificial Sweeteners2%

“Tastes like artificial sweetener”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Totally false advertising”

Ingredients-Overall1%

“too many untested ingredients”

Top return reasons

Nutritional Content100%