Skip to content
53

mucinex

Worth a look

Shows a $8.8M/yr market, but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 100Growth 7Conversion 98Competition 41Returns 100Price range 70Avg price 84Brand share 0Review moat 24Quality gap 18

Market size

Incredible$8.8M

$8.8M/yr · 2.8M searches

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible16.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great$18.50

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$7.01–$33.52

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay60%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Bad6,105.8

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-35.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 60% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

4 falling

Sellers

107

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Mucinex69%
  • Amazon Basic Care27%
  • WELMATE2%
  • GenCare2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$440K10%$881K15%$1.3M20%$1.8M1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 20 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 66 weeks — -35.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
100K60KSpike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26AprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Jan, Feb, Nov, Dec · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency15%

“Works Well”

Value For Money12%

“much less expensive”

Cough Relief11%

“Good for cough”

Quality-Overall9%

“As good as brand name”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“Works as stated”

Sinus Relief8%

“Really helps clear my sinuses”

Cold Relief7%

“Cold relief”

Dosage3%

“Having the max strength formula is nice so you're not having to double up or take extra doses”

Breathability2%

“Helps with my breathing”

Sleep Quality2%

“It will let you sleep”

What buyers complain about

Ease Of Use28%

“Not user friendly”

Functionality-Overall11%

“Did not work”

Value For Money5%

“Very costly”

Cough Relief4%

“Break up coughing”

Design-Overall3%

“Stupidest Cap Design”

Size-Overall2%

“A bit small”

Dosage2%

“Two big pills don't like”

Taste-Overall2%

“tastes weird”

Allergies2%

“I had a reaction to the dextromethorphan”

Side Effects2%

“Bad side effects”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall17%
Value For Money10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Dosage9%
Ease Of Chewing/Swallowing8%
Size-Overall7%
Cough Relief7%
Joint Pain5%
Heart Health4%
Product Condition3%