Skip to content
50

mentol fuerte para el dolor

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 65Growth 28Conversion 96Competition 33Returns 100Price range 73Avg price 76Brand share 0Review moat 24Quality gap 27

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible13.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great$15.23

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.88–$39.43

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$629K

$629K/yr · 312K searches

Competition

Okay65%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Okay+2.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Okay4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad5,899.74

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 65% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

5 falling

Sellers

104

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Icy Hot69%
  • Biofreeze23%
  • Mineral Ice4%
  • Vicks2%
  • Bengay2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$63K20%$126K30%$189K40%$251K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 48 weeks — +2.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
23K18KBlack Friday '25Spike '26Aug '25Oct '25Nov '25Jan '26Mar '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency15%

“Works ok”

Smell13%

“Relaxing scent”

Quality-Overall12%

“Excellent product have been using for a year”

Value For Money8%

“Affordable price”

Muscle Pain Relief7%

“Good for muscle aches”

Joint Pain7%

“The Best for knee pain”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As Advertised”

Ease Of Use4%

“is user-friendly”

Ease Of Application2%

“The roll-on applicator is very convenient and clean”

Absorbency2%

“It absorbs well”

What buyers complain about

Smell18%

“Has an odd smell”

Functionality-Overall15%

“Did not work like the product said”

Pain Relief-Overall9%

“Did not relieve pain”

Heating7%

“There was no heating or cooling sensation”

Durability4%

“Arrived broken, burst everywhere”

Value For Money4%

“Expensive”

Joint Pain3%

“No this didnt help my arthritis pain so I cant recommend it for that”

Ease Of Use2%

“extremely difficult to use”

Size-Overall2%

“Very small size”

Allergies2%

“Obviously a chemical burn”

Top return reasons

Value For Money50%
Functionality-Overall50%