Skip to content
45

menthol

Skip it

Brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 99Growth 10Conversion 95Competition 10Returns 100Price range 47Avg price 43Brand share 0Review moat 21Quality gap 21

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Incredible$6.6M

$6.6M/yr · 4.7M searches

Conversion

Incredible12.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Okay$5.03–$23.69

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Avg price

Okay$11.13

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad10,479.67

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-29.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Bad88%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 88% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

3 flat

Sellers

68

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Vicks77%
  • Amazon Basics18%
  • Mentholatum5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%$991K30%$2.0M45%$3.0M60%$4.0M1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 9 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -29.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
150K100KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall16%

“Just as good as name brand”

Smell12%

“Good smell”

Efficiency9%

“is very effective”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As advertised”

Value For Money7%

“Good value for money”

Cold Relief6%

“Great for the cold and flu”

Breathability4%

“I can breath again”

Ease Of Use4%

“Many uses, great product to keep around”

Cough Relief4%

“Very helpful for coughing or congestion”

Strength3%

“Strong very good”

What buyers complain about

Smell20%

“very weak smell”

Value For Money13%

“To Expensive”

Size-Overall12%

“Very small portion”

Strength10%

“Not very strong”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“False Advertisement”

Quality-Overall4%

“it simply is not as good”

Functionality-Overall2%

“Weaker strength does not work like it use too”

Ingredients-Overall2%

“Different ingredients”

Allergies2%

“I got this for allergy like nasal congestion Ive been having”

Sleep Quality1%

“This does nothing for my cold or quality of sleep”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall100%