Skip to content
60

menstrual pads for swimming

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +207.6% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 14Growth 98Conversion 30Competition 79Returns 16Price range 75Avg price 86Brand share 65Review moat 66Quality gap 85

Growth

Incredible+207.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great$19.41

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Great36%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Great$8.54–$34.08

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good867.66

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good66%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Conversion

Okay2.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Bad8.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Bad$54K

$54K/yr · 116K searches

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (36% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

19 falling

Sellers

24

Top-5 brand share

66%

Open market

28%

  • Jayloa25%
  • OVRUNS19%
  • ILIORGOGO8%
  • Leovqn8%
  • Reem Geafftar6%
  • KMXNVB6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$2K8%$4K12%$6K16%$9K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 38 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +207.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '25Prime Day '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: May, Jun, Jul, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 6.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall19%

“The fit is comfortable”

Comfort-Overall15%

“Feel comfortable”

Water Resistance11%

“Perfect for swimming without worries”

Quality-Overall8%

“They seem well made”

Soft Feel5%

“Ita a nice material that is skin soft”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As advertised”

Protection3%

“They are a recommended purchase for those looking for effective protection”

Material Quality3%

“The material is soft”

Absorbency3%

“They are very absorbant”

Durability2%

“They are a very durable”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall18%

“they are a little tight”

Functionality-Overall11%

“Doesnt work”

Water Resistance10%

“They are not waterproof”

Comfort-Overall5%

“they are so uncomfortable”

Adhesion/Stickiness4%

“To sticky couldnt get it in right spot”

Durability3%

“it didn't give me any confidence that it would last”

Thickness3%

“just not as thin as regular swim bottoms for obvious reasons”

Leak-Proof2%

“Leak”

Value For Money2%

“don't buy a waist of money”

Waist Fit2%

“its slightly loose on the butt area”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall66%
Waist Fit9%
Hip Fit5%
Advertised Vs Actual Product2%
Material Quality2%
Length2%
Shape/Style2%
Thigh Fit1%
Comfort-Overall1%
Thin1%