Skip to content
36

mediterranean diet food list

Skip it

Soft demand (-53.3% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 5Growth 0Conversion 54Competition 12Returns 76Price range 60Avg price 75Brand share 24Review moat 83Quality gap 72

Review moat

Great334.09

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Returns

Great1.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$15.08

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$9.95–$22.63

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good4.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Bad90%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Bad85%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad$21K

$21K/yr · 31K searches

Growth

Bad-53.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 85% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

9 flat

Sellers

11

Top-5 brand share

90%

Open market

7%

  • HAMIEW38%
  • MikerDelisin23%
  • EXCOOL CLUB21%
  • Generic6%
  • Catyan3%
  • POCAZONE3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$2K20%$4K30%$6K40%$8K101001K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 11 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 14 weeks — -53.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K600Spike '26Apr '26Apr '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use29%

“Easy to use”

Quality-Overall13%

“High Quality,”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“Described as advertised”

Color9%

“Very colorful and clear to understand”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting6%

“Easy to follow”

Value For Money6%

“Nice appearance, readability and value for your money”

Ease Of Cleaning5%

“laminated cardstock that wipes clean easily”

Design-Overall5%

“The layout is clear”

Durability5%

“Durable”

Material Quality3%

“love the material they're made of”

What buyers complain about

Value For Money60%

“Waste of Money”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“This item isnt what I expected”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting7%

“instructions on the internet”

Print Quality6%

“Print soooo small it's ridiculous”

Natural Resource Wastage6%

“waste of time”

Material Quality3%

“The chart material was flimsy and poor quality”

Measurement/Reading Accuracy2%

“Inaccurate”

Accuracy-Overall2%

“some don't seem accurate”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product43%
Print Quality11%
Value For Money8%
Size-Overall8%
Functionality-Overall4%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting3%
Quality-Overall3%
Design-Overall2%
Maintenance And Repair2%