Skip to content
50

medicines

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but soft demand (-45.4% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 96Growth 2Conversion 98Competition 31Returns 100Price range 68Avg price 78Brand share 3Review moat 24Quality gap 15

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible17.2%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Incredible$3.2M

$3.2M/yr · 1.2M searches

Avg price

Great$16.03

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.97–$34.09

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay66%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Bad5,065

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.8★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Bad99%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Growth

Bad-45.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 66% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

6 rising

Sellers

78

Top-5 brand share

99%

Open market

0%

  • Vicks63%
  • Amazon Basic Care27%
  • AXIV4%
  • Amazon Basics3%
  • Tylenol2%
  • Mucinex1%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$162K10%$323K15%$485K20%$647K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -45.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
60K40KSpike '24Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Feb · busiest ÷ quietest = 4.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money18%

“Very affordable”

Efficiency13%

“Works well”

Cold Relief13%

“Perfect for Colds”

Quality-Overall10%

“Just as good as name brand”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“Was as advertised”

Sleep Quality5%

“sleep much better”

Cough Relief5%

“Helped with my coughing”

Ease Of Use2%

“easy to use”

Taste-Overall2%

“Caplets are nice instead of the nasty tasting liquid”

Fever Relief2%

“still effective at decongestant and fever relief”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall10%

“No real taste”

Functionality-Overall10%

“I CAN'T CUT THE GEL PILLS IN HALF”

Value For Money6%

“Not worth even the cheap price”

Size-Overall6%

“Bottles are smaller than the non-HBP”

Cough Relief5%

“coughing more than I should”

Quality-Overall5%

“Not as good”

Dosage4%

“Each pairs of pills are difficult to open”

Ease Of Use3%

“It is impossible to open the small pill packaging without scissors”

Cold Relief3%

“I had a bad cold”

Sleep Quality3%

“And disappointed that the night tabs didn't help me sleep at all”