Skip to content
37

low glycemic index foods list

Skip it

Soft demand (-55.7% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 2Growth 0Conversion 66Competition 23Returns 93Price range 26Avg price 49Brand share 41Review moat 89Quality gap 53

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great224.07

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good5.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay$11.82

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Brand share

Okay80%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Price range

Okay$7.65–$17.53

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad$10K

$10K/yr · 14K searches

Growth

Bad-55.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

15

Top-5 brand share

80%

Open market

14%

  • Fodlist30%
  • Generic23%
  • Miarita11%
  • TUSGOR8%
  • TIEWPANMI8%
  • RedRoLL5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$95920%$2K30%$3K40%$4K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 14 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 100 weeks — -55.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
1K600Spike '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug, Sep, Oct · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.7×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Use36%

“Easy to use”

Quality-Overall11%

“Good information,”

Value For Money9%

“Worth the money spent”

Durability7%

“Its also sturdy for longevity”

Magnetic Strength/Adsorption7%

“Magnet great idea”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As described”

Color3%

“It is pretty colors”

Nutritional Content3%

“diabetes, being aware of dietary limitations takes on greater importance, and knowing how different foods affect body chemistry is vital information”

Organizing Capabilities3%

“I like that its organized into clear categories”

Health Monitoring3%

“this is super helpful to give me an idea of what to watch for”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall19%

“that is the only thing big”

Value For Money18%

“Not worth the money”

Ease Of Use14%

“Not very useful”

Natural Resource Wastage5%

“Waste”

Print Quality5%

“it makes it difficult to keep within sight versus posting to easily read”

Writing Experience5%

“the writing is just too small for me”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting5%

“Guide is not as easy to use as I hoped”

Wrinkles5%

“is wrinkle paper quality not good”

Strength5%

“Kinda flimsy”

Quality-Overall2%

“Product is very poorly made cannot read”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product54%
Size-Overall16%
Print Quality5%
Value For Money5%
Measurement/Reading Accuracy3%
Magnetic Strength/Adsorption3%
Ease Of Use2%
Quality-Overall2%
Adhesion/Stickiness2%
Wrinkles1%