Skip to content
60

lidocaine patches 5%

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 34Growth 52Conversion 67Competition 60Returns 100Price range 69Avg price 88Brand share 51Review moat 25Quality gap 76

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$20.05

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$5.27–$37.06

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good6.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good49%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Good+22.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Good74%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$163K

$163K/yr · 135K searches

Review moat

Bad4,137.44

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 49% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

12 falling

Sellers

82

Top-5 brand share

74%

Open market

20%

  • Aspercreme28%
  • CARELAND15%
  • Sumifun14%
  • WELMATE9%
  • Amazon Basic Care9%
  • Salonpas6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$7K8%$13K12%$20K16%$26K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +22.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '24Prime Day '25Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency15%

“Works Well”

Quality-Overall10%

“Quality is solid”

Value For Money9%

“Not expensive”

Joint Pain9%

“Works well for joint pain”

Adhesion/Stickiness6%

“Good adhesion”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As advertised”

Ease Of Use5%

“Easy to peel”

Ease Of Application4%

“It was smooth to apply”

Muscle Pain Relief4%

“Pretty good for muscle pain”

Size-Overall3%

“They fit perfectly”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness25%

“Doesn't stay on”

Functionality-Overall13%

“Did not work”

Pain Relief-Overall13%

“No relief”

Value For Money6%

“They are expensive”

Smell3%

“It also has an odor that smells like mildew”

Quality-Overall3%

“Not good quality”

Ease Of Use3%

“Very difficult to put on”

Size-Overall3%

“Container was smaller than I expected”

Durability3%

“dont last”

Allergies2%

“I had a bad rash”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall28%
Size-Overall18%
Adhesion/Stickiness15%
Joint Pain10%
Advertised Vs Actual Product7%
Pain Relief-Overall5%
Value For Money3%
Product Condition2%
Leak-Proof2%
Thin1%