Skip to content
57

lidocaine menthol patches

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 21Growth 61Conversion 96Competition 40Returns 100Price range 68Avg price 81Brand share 37Review moat 25Quality gap 68

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible13.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great$17.47

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$7.17–$31.89

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+37.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Okay61%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay83%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad4,299.95

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Market size

Bad$85K

$85K/yr · 35K searches

Competition

The top 5 products take 61% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 rising

Sellers

90

Top-5 brand share

83%

Open market

11%

  • Icy Hot44%
  • Sumifun13%
  • HealthWise12%
  • AUVON8%
  • Amazon Basic Care6%
  • ZEEY6%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 11%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$4K10%$9K15%$13K20%$17K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency13%

“Works Well”

Quality-Overall11%

“EXCELLENT PRODUCT”

Value For Money8%

“worth every penny”

Adhesion/Stickiness7%

“Sticks well”

Joint Pain7%

“It works great on my knee”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“Item arrived as described”

Ease Of Use5%

“easy to take off”

Muscle Pain Relief5%

“Helpful with muscle spasms”

Size-Overall4%

“fits”

Ease Of Application4%

“They are cool upon application”

What buyers complain about

Adhesion/Stickiness25%

“Needs better adhesive”

Pain Relief-Overall13%

“Absolutely no relief”

Functionality-Overall11%

“Not effective”

Value For Money7%

“price has doubled”

Smell5%

“Bad Smell”

Ease Of Use4%

“hard to open”

Durability3%

“Didn't seem to last very long”

Quality-Overall3%

“Poor quality”

Strength2%

“Flimsy”

Size-Overall2%

“Patch is Too Small”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall25%
Adhesion/Stickiness15%
Functionality-Overall13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product13%
Joint Pain8%
Heating5%
Value For Money5%
Smell2%
Pain Relief-Overall2%
Defective Material/Parts2%