Skip to content
59

kill cliff

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.1%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 68Growth 21Conversion 58Competition 75Returns 100Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 10Review moat 66Quality gap 45

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$36.47

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible$20.27–$75.48

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Great40%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Market size

Good$698K

$698K/yr · 385K searches

Review moat

Good874.17

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good5.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-7.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad96%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (40% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

3 falling

Sellers

16

Top-5 brand share

96%

Open market

0%

  • Jocko Fuel84%
  • Origin8%
  • Kill Cliff5%
  • --4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$28K8%$56K12%$84K16%$112K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 36 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 96 weeks — -7.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KBlack Friday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26DecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Feb, Mar, Apr, May, Jun · busiest ÷ quietest = 6.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall23%

“No weird taste”

Nutritional Content13%

“Excellent protein shake”

Flavor10%

“Nice chocolate flavor”

Quality-Overall7%

“These seem like a clean, well-made product”

Value For Money5%

“Good for the money”

Energy Level5%

“feel my energy levels have improved significantly”

Ingredients-Overall3%

“No junk ingredients”

Blend/Ratio2%

“Blends well”

Solubility2%

“mixes well”

Ease Of Use2%

“Very easy to use”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall21%

“very artificial tasting”

Value For Money9%

“Overpriced”

Flavor7%

“Not as strong a flavor of that”

Sweetness3%

“These are not overly sweet”

Ingredients-Overall3%

“No correct ingredients”

Nutritional Content3%

“Below average protein”

Functionality-Overall2%

“Didn't work for me”

Artificial Sweeteners2%

“To me, it gives it that overly sweet/artificial sweetener taste”

Smell2%

“The only way i noticed the garlic strong odor is when i have it on an empty stomach”

Side Effects2%

“Gave me vertigo”

Top return reasons

Taste-Overall23%
Flavor19%
Nutritional Content14%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Leak-Proof8%
Value For Money5%
Ingredients-Overall4%
Texture/Consistency-Overall3%
Size-Overall2%
Sweetness2%