Skip to content
59

high stim pre workout

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 80Growth 21Conversion 82Competition 52Returns 100Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 0Review moat 37Quality gap 65

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$28.18

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible$16.48–$38.51

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Great8.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great$1.1M

$1.1M/yr · 457K searches

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Good54%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Okay2,785.35

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-7.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

2 falling

Sellers

17

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • REDCON172%
  • ProSupps28%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$56K10%$113K15%$169K20%$226K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 26 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -7.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
23K18KPrime Day '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug, Sep · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall23%

“it tasted AMAZING”

Flavor12%

“Great flavor”

Energy Level9%

“Helps with energy”

Quality-Overall8%

“Good product and consistent”

Value For Money7%

“Very affordable price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Does the job”

Caffeine Content4%

“hoping the rush/energy is good enough for a heavy caffeine user”

Focus Enhancement3%

“when it kicks in the focus”

Solubility3%

“dissolves easily”

Efficiency2%

“effective”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall33%

“Taste like Chemicals”

Flavor6%

“Gross flavor”

Side Effects6%

“My face began to tingle”

Quality-Overall3%

“Not the best”

Allergies3%

“I felt like I was having an allergic reaction the way I was itching”

Acid Regulator/Stomach Ache Relief3%

“my stomach started getting upset too so I couldn't move as much as I wanted--”

Ingredients-Overall3%

“Other than the product containing poison”

Bitter2%

“Bitter,”

Energy Level2%

“No energy”

Nutritional Content2%

“This isnt a supplement”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product40%
Ease Of Use20%
Smell20%
Sensitivity-Overall10%
Strength10%