Skip to content
56

hemorrhoid treatment

Worth a look

Shows a $15.5M/yr market, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 100Growth 24Conversion 99Competition 38Returns 100Price range 68Avg price 81Brand share 5Review moat 17Quality gap 33

Market size

Incredible$15.5M

$15.5M/yr · 4.7M searches

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible18.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great$17.50

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.43–$35.36

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Okay62%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Bad-2.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad19,229.35

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad98%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 62% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

6 falling

Sellers

93

Top-5 brand share

98%

Open market

0%

  • Preparation H58%
  • Doctor Butler's14%
  • Amazon Basic Care10%
  • TUCKS9%
  • REVIVOL-XR6%
  • Ebanel2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$1.6M20%$3.1M30%$4.7M40%$6.2M1K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -2.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
100K60KSpike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency17%

“Works well as needed”

Quality-Overall17%

“Great product & came as described”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“As described”

Value For Money8%

“Worth it”

Ease Of Use4%

“Easy to use”

Soothing Effect4%

“These wipes are soothing”

Comfort-Overall4%

“comfortable to use”

Inflammation3%

“Decreases inflammation and swelling”

Itch Relief2%

“Good stuff, soothes itching and helps healing”

Allergies2%

“Very good & great relief of irritation”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall19%

“no results”

Value For Money12%

“its expensive”

Pain Relief-Overall8%

“Painful”

Allergies6%

“Allergic reaction”

Size-Overall5%

“the cap was to big”

Quality-Overall4%

“Cheap made”

Ease Of Use3%

“Unbelievably hard to use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Not as they were”

Itch Relief2%

“This did nothing for the itch at all”

Thickness2%

“they seem thicker”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall100%