Skip to content
61

hemorrhoid cream with lidocaine

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 68Growth 61Conversion 99Competition 35Returns 100Price range 66Avg price 79Brand share 26Review moat 22Quality gap 50

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible18.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great$16.59

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Market size

Good$697K

$697K/yr · 227K searches

Price range

Good$5.43–$33.63

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Good+37.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Okay64%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay89%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad9,848.24

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

The top 5 products take 64% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

9 falling

Sellers

71

Top-5 brand share

89%

Open market

7%

  • Preparation H50%
  • Doctor Butler's14%
  • WELMATE13%
  • REVIVOL-XR8%
  • RectaEase4%
  • TUCKS4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$70K20%$139K30%$209K40%$279K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 17 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +37.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Mar, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency21%

“Works Well”

Quality-Overall17%

“just a helpful product”

Value For Money11%

“value for money”

Advertised Vs Actual Product9%

“Exactly as advertised”

Inflammation4%

“Good for inflammation”

Ease Of Use3%

“Easy to use”

Itch Relief3%

“It definitely relieved itchiness”

Comfort-Overall3%

“Comfort and Ease of use”

Allergies2%

“Non irritatng and works wel for me”

Ease Of Application2%

“Application- Also very effective”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall27%

“no results”

Value For Money14%

“Too expensive”

Pain Relief-Overall11%

“No pain relief”

Allergies6%

“I felt the itching”

Itch Relief3%

“This did nothing for the itch at all”

Quality-Overall3%

“Garbage”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Not as described”

Ease Of Use2%

“Sucks to need to use it”

Side Effects2%

“MADE ME WORSE”

Inflammation2%

“Burns”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall100%