Skip to content
64

hanpo japanese herbal patch stomach

Worth a look

Shows beatable incumbent ratings (3.6★), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 26Growth 95Conversion 53Competition 64Returns 20Price range 75Avg price 87Brand share 67Review moat 80Quality gap 99

Quality gap

Incredible3.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Incredible+119.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great$19.93

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great396.38

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Great$8.78–$33.63

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Good65%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Good47%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Good4.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Okay$105K

$105K/yr · 120K searches

Returns

Bad7.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

The top 5 products take 47% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

19 rising

Sellers

27

Top-5 brand share

65%

Open market

30%

  • Generic29%
  • NEWUREHO11%
  • FTKV10%
  • GIRLDREN9%
  • CRIVERY6%
  • YUCVIAS6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$3K6%$6K9%$9K12%$13K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)1 product missing review or click data not plotted

All 29 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 12 weeks — +119.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
12K8KSpike '26Apr '26May '26May '26May '26Jun '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall12%

“Very comfortable”

Quality-Overall11%

“Excellent product”

Size-Overall10%

“it fits perfectly giving the snatched effect”

Value For Money6%

“Great value”

Ease Of Use4%

“It is easy to wear”

Smell4%

“Smell great”

Advertised Vs Actual Product4%

“Just as advertised”

Adhesion/Stickiness3%

“adhere well”

Ease Of Application2%

“feel comfortable during application without causing irritation or discomfort”

Shape/Style2%

“I was amazed how it shaped my body”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall20%

“Does not work as expected”

Size-Overall8%

“it does not fit”

Heating6%

“Never heated up”

Allergies6%

“Itchy”

Value For Money4%

“although it was a bit more expensive”

Durability3%

“Damage quickly at the first attempt”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“False advising, does nothing”

Pain Relief-Overall3%

“It does kind of hurt”

Adhesion/Stickiness3%

“they are definitely very sticky”

Side Effects2%

“All it did was burn”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall57%
Waist Fit12%
Comfort-Overall4%
Length4%
Advertised Vs Actual Product4%
Material Quality3%
Weight Heavy2%
Width2%
Functionality-Overall2%
Velcro Quality1%