Skip to content
64

gnat repellent

Worth a look

Shows demand growing +315.1% this quarter, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 53Growth 100Conversion 79Competition 42Returns 95Price range 68Avg price 80Brand share 12Review moat 25Quality gap 72

Growth

Incredible+315.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Returns

Incredible1.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$17.02

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$7.43–$30.73

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$351K

$351K/yr · 261K searches

Competition

Okay60%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Review moat

Bad4,312.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad95%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 60% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

8 falling

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

95%

Open market

2%

  • No Natz44%
  • Buggins36%
  • BUGGINS5%
  • Summit5%
  • Best Bee Brothers4%
  • Repel2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 2%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$18K10%$35K15%$53K20%$70K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 24 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 44 weeks — +315.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '25Spike '26Sep '25Oct '25Dec '25Feb '26Mar '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Pest/Insect Control32%

“Keeps bugs away”

Smell29%

“Smells really fresh”

Quality-Overall9%

“Solid product”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Works as advertised”

Spray/Flow4%

“This spray works amazing”

Strength3%

“It is strong”

Value For Money2%

“good value”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to use”

Safety Standards2%

“is safe around pets”

Size-Overall1%

“Size and effectiveness”

What buyers complain about

Pest/Insect Control35%

“Did not repel”

Functionality-Overall18%

“Did Not Work”

Smell9%

“smells terrible”

Spray/Flow5%

“it won't spray”

Value For Money4%

“On the downside, expensive”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“misleading”

Leak-Proof3%

“Leaking issue”

Durability2%

“Its not very long lasting”

Quality-Overall2%

“Poor quality”

Contamination1%

“ants”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall13%
Spray/Flow13%
Pest/Insect Control12%
Value For Money12%
Size-Overall12%
Leak-Proof10%
Smell8%
Advertised Vs Actual Product8%
Defective Material/Parts5%
Strength1%