Skip to content
51

generic allegra

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (19.7% search→purchase), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 50Growth 78Conversion 100Competition 10Returns 100Price range 61Avg price 77Brand share 0Review moat 24Quality gap 19

Conversion

Incredible19.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Great+68.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Avg price

Great$15.66

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$10.01–$22.92

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$275K

$275K/yr · 89K searches

Review moat

Bad5,798.44

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad88%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 88% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

5 falling

Sellers

9

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Amazon Basic Care56%
  • CAMBER PHARMACEUTICALS, INC19%
  • HealthA2Z15%
  • HealthCareAisle6%
  • GenCare4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%15%$41K30%$83K45%$124K60%$165K1K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 9 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 74 weeks — +68.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '25Spike '26MarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecJanFebMarAprMayJun

Peak months: Apr, May · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money27%

“Great deal”

Allergies20%

“Helps with my Allergies”

Efficiency12%

“Works well for my daughter”

Advertised Vs Actual Product11%

“As advertised”

Quality-Overall7%

“Just as good as the name brand”

Side Effects2%

“No side effects”

Dosage2%

“200 mg works well”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to use”

Ease Of Chewing/Swallowing1%

“Easy to swallow”

Fever Relief1%

“Fexofenadine has proven to be the most effective antihistamine for me”

What buyers complain about

Allergies27%

“Severe Allergies”

Functionality-Overall10%

“Didn't work”

Dosage5%

“It was like taking a double dose of Benadryl by mistake”

Size-Overall4%

“Tablet size is too large”

Value For Money3%

“Cost”

Sleep Quality3%

“This does not make you sleepy”

Ingredients-Overall3%

“Inconsistency with ingredients”

Quality-Overall3%

“Absolutely terrible product”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“These really dont work well as the name brand diss”

Ease Of Chewing/Swallowing2%

“hard to swallow”