Skip to content
52

fruit loops protein shake

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 57Growth 53Conversion 77Competition 13Returns 100Price range 95Avg price 95Brand share 0Review moat 26Quality gap 52

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$23.77

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Incredible$17.18–$34.46

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Great7.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Good$431K

$431K/yr · 241K searches

Growth

Good+24.1%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay3,898.33

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad84%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 84% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

2 falling

Sellers

24

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Six Star62%
  • Dymatize38%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$43K20%$86K30%$129K40%$172K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 9 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 36 weeks — +24.1% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KHoliday '25Spike '26Nov '25Dec '25Jan '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall38%

“Absolutely Delicious”

Nutritional Content17%

“Good protein,”

Flavor10%

“Flavor is REALLY strong”

Value For Money7%

“Very affordable”

Quality-Overall3%

“Great powder”

Solubility2%

“The powder mixes very well”

Sweetness2%

“Sweet in smoothies”

Blend/Ratio1%

“Tastes good for the price blends well”

Ease Of Use1%

“Easy to use”

Texture/Consistency-Overall1%

“the texture is smooth”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall34%

“Chemical taste”

Flavor10%

“Bad flavor”

Nutritional Content5%

“I needed more protein”

Value For Money5%

“A little expensive”

Smell3%

“It smells and tastes like burnt plastic”

Sweetness3%

“It's not overly sweet like many”

Solubility2%

“Mixability is not great”

Ingredients-Overall1%

“isn't hardly inspected for safe ingredients”

Quality-Overall1%

“For quality I don't really have anything to compare it to”

Artificial Sweeteners1%

“The chocolate has a strong artificial sweetener flavor”