Skip to content
67

frankincense and myrrh

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.6%), but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 71Growth 24Conversion 70Competition 86Returns 97Price range 86Avg price 87Brand share 79Review moat 29Quality gap 55

Returns

Incredible0.6%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$19.82

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Competition

Great29%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Great$6.99–$76.19

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Brand share

Great56%

top-5 brand share — no brand owns this niche

Market size

Good$757K

$757K/yr · 601K searches

Conversion

Good6.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Okay3,627.73

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-1.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (29% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

32 falling

Sellers

81

Top-5 brand share

56%

Open market

40%

  • FRANKINCENSE & MYRRH36%
  • THE JERUSALEM GIFT SHOP SINCE 20045%
  • Herbal Mana5%
  • Wise Men5%
  • Majestic Pure4%
  • Nexon Botanics4%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%2%$15K4%$30K6%$45K8%$61K1101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 45 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -1.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
15K10KSpike '24Holiday '24Prime Day '25Spike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.5×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell33%

“Calming aroma”

Quality-Overall11%

“the quality has been consistent”

Efficiency9%

“Works ok”

Joint Pain8%

“Love this for my joints”

Value For Money6%

“Best Money Spent”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Works as advertised”

Soft Feel2%

“Goes on smoothly”

Moist/Dry2%

“It really helps with dry skin”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to use”

Muscle Pain Relief2%

“Fabulous to help sore muscles”

What buyers complain about

Smell37%

“Overpowering scent”

Functionality-Overall10%

“slow”

Pain Relief-Overall8%

“No relief”

Value For Money4%

“Expensive”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“FALSE ADVERTISEMENT”

Ingredients-Overall3%

“Ingredients changed”

Allergies3%

“Skin rash”

Quality-Overall2%

“mainly when it is due to cheap quality”

Size-Overall2%

“Its a tiny bottle”

Durability1%

“didnt last”

Top return reasons

Smell54%
Advertised Vs Actual Product12%
Functionality-Overall7%
Leak-Proof6%
Size-Overall3%
Joint Pain2%
Quality-Overall2%
Oily/Greasy2%
Value For Money2%
Ingredients-Overall1%