Skip to content
50

flush your system of thc

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 94% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 18Growth 20Conversion 56Competition 33Returns 99Price range 80Avg price 88Brand share 15Review moat 84Quality gap 95

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Quality gap

Incredible4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great$20.00

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Great317.89

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Great$6.81–$51.95

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good4.8%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Okay65%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-9.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Bad$71K

$71K/yr · 75K searches

Brand share

Bad94%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 65% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

8 falling

Sellers

27

Top-5 brand share

94%

Open market

4%

  • High Voltage Detox64%
  • AEDIKO17%
  • GODIYMODULES6%
  • DORHEA4%
  • DEVMO3%
  • ZORZA2%
  • Open — no brand owns it (2 brands, 4%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$7K20%$14K30%$21K40%$28K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '24SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Aug, Sep, Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 3.1×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Advertised Vs Actual Product21%

“Worked as advertised”

Efficiency18%

“Works great”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting16%

“Followed instructions exactly”

Quality-Overall8%

“Flawless product”

Value For Money5%

“Worth the money it works”

Functionality-Overall4%

“They worked perfectly for wat I'm using them for”

Taste-Overall3%

“A positive of this herbal drink is that, for me, it didn't taste bad”

Side Effects2%

“No side effects and taste good”

Ease Of Cleaning1%

“It cleaned up the carbon buildup pretty quickly”

Strength1%

“delivered a strong”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall40%

“DID NOT WORK”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting8%

“just lived with the fact that there are no formal assembly instructions included”

Taste-Overall7%

“Tastes terrible”

Value For Money6%

“Could've cost me alot”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Did not work as advertised”

Quality-Overall3%

“Junk”

Side Effects3%

“Its an indication that it hasn't fully taken effect yet”

Weight Loss3%

“completely bloated myself to the point i couldnt even drive because i had to pee so much”

Dosage2%

“To be short - I wouldn't buy this product again with the purpose of passing a drug test”

Strength2%

“fragile”

Top return reasons

Functionality-Overall42%
Defective Material/Parts15%
Leak-Proof14%
Advertised Vs Actual Product11%
Connectivity-Overall6%
Value For Money6%
Certifications3%
Weight Heavy1%
Size-Overall1%
Quality-Overall1%