Skip to content
49

flum

Skip it

Soft demand (-9.9% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 23Growth 20Conversion 32Competition 42Returns 93Price range 78Avg price 89Brand share 23Review moat 52Quality gap 100

Quality gap

Incredible3.1★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Great1.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$20.73

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$7.99–$41.46

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good1,411.42

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Okay60%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Conversion

Okay2.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Bad$94K

$94K/yr · 175K searches

Brand share

Bad91%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Growth

Bad-9.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 60% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

9 falling

Sellers

14

Top-5 brand share

91%

Open market

7%

  • cigtrus74%
  • MOXE6%
  • Healfs5%
  • Heabal3%
  • xuan chi3%
  • VAPE VAC3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (3 brands, 7%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$9K20%$19K30%$28K40%$37K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 19 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -9.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
9K7KSpike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Aug · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.8×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall13%

“Love taste”

Flavor11%

“the variety of flavors”

Quality-Overall8%

“Great item, tried the variety pack”

Value For Money7%

“they're not expensive”

Efficiency5%

“Works great for my husband”

Smell5%

“and has a pleasant scent”

Ease Of Use4%

“I have one now comes very handy”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“It is exactly what it says it is”

Oral Hygiene3%

“These breathing sticks are good for an oral fixation in situations where you are unable to have gum or other stimuli”

Stress/Anxiety3%

“They help me not miss or crave it”

What buyers complain about

Value For Money17%

“overpriced”

Taste-Overall17%

“It tastes like cardboard”

Flavor9%

“The flavors are gross”

Smell7%

“The smoke smells”

Functionality-Overall7%

“DOESN'T WORK AS ADVERTISED”

Size-Overall6%

“The only reason for 4 stars is they were shorter then I would have liked”

Quality-Overall3%

“Quality is not here”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“NOT AS ADVERTISED”

Strength3%

“Much too strong”

Durability2%

“dies after 45 minutes”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product20%
Flavor14%
Taste-Overall14%
Functionality-Overall12%
Smell11%
Breathability8%
Size-Overall3%
Ingredients-Overall3%
Quality-Overall2%
Product Condition2%