Skip to content
53

fireplace deodorizer

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (14.0% search→purchase), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 46Growth 59Conversion 96Competition 7Returns 92Price range 81Avg price 87Brand share 0Review moat 25Quality gap 73

Conversion

Incredible14.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Great1.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$19.66

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$10.04–$38.40

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Growth

Good+34.9%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Market size

Okay$246K

$246K/yr · 90K searches

Review moat

Bad4,397.75

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad92%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 92% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

4 falling

Sellers

14

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • MOSO NATURAL82%
  • Vergali13%
  • CLEVAST3%
  • Mayunuo2%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$25K20%$49K30%$74K40%$99K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 8 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +34.9% search growth over the last 90 days.
2K2KHoliday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Smell38%

“smells nice”

Quality-Overall15%

“Overall, its a decent product and does have some effect,”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“As advertised”

Efficiency6%

“Works well”

Value For Money6%

“Great value”

Ease Of Use6%

“Easy to Use”

Size-Overall3%

“it fits perfectly”

Absorbency1%

“They worked really well in absorbing odors”

Ease Of Cleaning1%

“while its nice it auto cleans”

Durability1%

“durable”

What buyers complain about

Smell46%

“Odor”

Functionality-Overall23%

“Doesn't work well at all”

Value For Money6%

“Waste of money”

Size-Overall3%

“Very Small Bags”

Absorbency2%

“They dont absorb anything”

Advertised Vs Actual Product1%

“Dont work as described”

Durability1%

“it set for 2 months with no power”

Natural Resource Wastage1%

“Complete waste of money”

Leak-Proof1%

“It seems these charcoal bags leak fine charcoal dust”

Color1%

“Color is not as advertised”

Top return reasons

Smell48%
Functionality-Overall20%
Size-Overall11%
Advertised Vs Actual Product6%
Absorbency4%
Value For Money3%
Air Purification2%
Defective Material/Parts1%
Leak-Proof1%
Product Condition1%