Skip to content
53

fake cigarettes

Worth a look

Shows beatable incumbent ratings (4.0★), but soft demand (-13.6% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 61Growth 18Conversion 66Competition 21Returns 87Price range 62Avg price 66Brand share 31Review moat 76Quality gap 96

Quality gap

Incredible4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Returns

Great1.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Review moat

Great471.5

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Conversion

Good5.9%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Good$13.89

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$5.14–$30.83

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Good$538K

$538K/yr · 658K searches

Brand share

Okay86%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Bad75%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Growth

Bad-13.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 75% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

11 rising

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

86%

Open market

11%

  • HONGTEYA34%
  • CLESEN27%
  • Honeyrose16%
  • ArtCreativity5%
  • SuperStroke4%
  • STEP3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 11%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$54K20%$108K30%$161K40%$215K101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 14 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -13.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
35K25KSpike '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Fun/Entertainment Experience11%

“Super fun”

Value For Money9%

“affordable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Works like a charm”

Quality-Overall7%

“Looks good, feel nice, and doesn't burn too fast”

Taste-Overall7%

“Doesnt smell or taste as bad as other reviews”

Strength6%

“they are sturdy”

Flavor6%

“A very good product with a great flavor”

Ease Of Use4%

“Easy to use”

Smell3%

“The only thing I can say is that it worked for me I enjoyed it I tried everything it is more comforting my breath smells better I breathe better I would recommend it to anyone”

Gifting Purpose3%

“Gift for friend”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall22%

“Horrible taste”

Smell10%

“they give off a horrible smell”

Value For Money9%

“Way over-priced”

Quality-Overall8%

“Not as good as one I bought years ago and still have”

Flavor7%

“Not good flavor”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“Not as advertised”

Functionality-Overall5%

“Look ok, work poorly”

Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting4%

“These did not work at all no matter how much I reread the instructions, very disappointing”

Dosage2%

“they're so irritating I couldn't take it I didn't even finish one pack of the three”

Stale/Rotten/Spoiled2%

“Raw sewage”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product18%
Functionality-Overall15%
Taste-Overall12%
Flavor9%
Smell7%
Breathability5%
Size-Overall4%
Ingredients-Overall4%
Defective Material/Parts4%
Value For Money3%