Skip to content
51

eye compress for stye

Worth a look

Shows searches that convert (12.0% search→purchase), but soft demand (-9.8% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 54Growth 20Conversion 95Competition 24Returns 86Price range 72Avg price 79Brand share 31Review moat 25Quality gap 60

Conversion

Great12.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Great1.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Great$16.68

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$7.89–$33.15

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Market size

Good$361K

$361K/yr · 181K searches

Brand share

Okay86%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Bad4,827

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Growth

Bad-9.8%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

11 falling

Sellers

49

Top-5 brand share

86%

Open market

10%

  • myhalos33%
  • Bruder24%
  • Thermalon16%
  • Stye8%
  • kimkoo6%
  • AiricePac3%
  • Open — no brand owns it (5 brands, 10%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$36K20%$72K30%$108K40%$145K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 100 weeks — -9.8% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KSpike '24Holiday '24Spike '25Prime Day '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Jun, Jul · busiest ÷ quietest = 10.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Comfort-Overall15%

“Comfortable fit”

Quality-Overall12%

“The cover is high quality”

Eye-Hygiene11%

“It helps my eyes”

Ease Of Use9%

“Easy to use and store”

Efficiency6%

“It works beautifully”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“As described”

Value For Money4%

“Very affordable”

Moist/Dry4%

“Helps with dry eyes”

Size-Overall3%

“the mask fits well”

Heating Element3%

“Heats up very quickly”

What buyers complain about

Heating20%

“Doesn't Retain Heat”

Smell7%

“Awful smell”

Durability5%

“It fell apart”

Quality-Overall4%

“Bad quality”

Value For Money4%

“High cost”

Size-Overall3%

“Smaller than expected”

Functionality-Overall3%

“Didn't Work”

Comfort-Overall3%

“a little awkward to have on”

Moist/Dry3%

“Dried out”

Weight Heavy3%

“Too heavy”

Top return reasons

Heating18%
Size-Overall16%
Advertised Vs Actual Product9%
Functionality-Overall8%
Comfort-Overall7%
Weight Heavy5%
Material Quality4%
Smell4%
Compression3%
Product Condition3%