Skip to content
61

ensure high calorie

Worth a look

Shows a $25.0M/yr market, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 100Growth 25Conversion 91Competition 70Returns 100Price range 87Avg price 95Brand share 0Review moat 24Quality gap 21

Market size

Incredible$25.0M

$25.0M/yr · 6.4M searches

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$35.81

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Conversion

Great11.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Price range

Great$9.72–$65.53

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Good43%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Growth

Bad-0.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad5,787.94

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Quality gap

Bad4.7★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products take 43% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

3 falling

Sellers

130

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Ensure68%
  • BOOST20%
  • Carnation Breakfast Essentials12%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$1.3M10%$2.5M15%$3.8M20%$5.0M1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 35 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 36 weeks — -0.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
175K125KSpike '26Nov '25Dec '25Jan '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall32%

“Very tasty drink”

Nutritional Content19%

“Great nutritional supplement”

Flavor10%

“Amazing flavor”

Quality-Overall7%

“Good variety”

Value For Money6%

“Fair price”

Ease Of Use2%

“Ease of use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“As described”

Energy Level2%

“Energy boost”

Vitamin2%

“Tasty with vitamins”

Weight Loss2%

“Boost For Weight Loss”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall20%

“Horrible after taste”

Value For Money9%

“Little expensive”

Nutritional Content7%

“poor source of nutrition”

Flavor6%

“Horrible weak flavor”

Sweetness4%

“It's got too much sugar”

Leak-Proof3%

“The bottles leak”

Thickness2%

“It was thick chunky”

Ease Of Use2%

“isnt easy,”

Texture/Consistency-Overall2%

“I didn't like the texture”

Artificial Sweeteners1%

“Did not like Stevia after taste”

Top return reasons

Taste-Overall100%