Skip to content
46

emuaid hemorrhoids ointment

Skip it

Soft demand (-10.4% this quarter) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 25Growth 20Conversion 61Competition 26Returns 100Price range 76Avg price 95Brand share 33Review moat 22Quality gap 62

Returns

Incredible0.1%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$24.24

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$7.62–$38.85

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Quality gap

Good4.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Conversion

Good5.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Brand share

Okay85%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Competition

Okay70%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Market size

Okay$101K

$101K/yr · 77K searches

Review moat

Bad9,754.92

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-10.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 70% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

10 falling

Sellers

79

Top-5 brand share

85%

Open market

11%

  • REVIVOL-XR46%
  • Doctor Butler's21%
  • Dermoscribe7%
  • LMNOOP6%
  • TUCKS5%
  • Calmoseptine4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (4 brands, 11%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$10K20%$20K30%$30K40%$40K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 13 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -10.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
6K4KSpike '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan, Mar · busiest ÷ quietest = 2.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Efficiency17%

“Works Well”

Quality-Overall13%

“A reliable brand”

Value For Money8%

“Great price”

Allergies7%

“no more rashes”

Advertised Vs Actual Product6%

“As described”

Soothing Effect4%

“Works fast and soothing”

Ease Of Use4%

“Easy to use”

Inflammation3%

“Good pain / inflammation reliever”

Comfort-Overall3%

“Great comfort”

Itch Relief2%

“I have not been itchy since”

What buyers complain about

Functionality-Overall13%

“Not effective”

Value For Money12%

“Its expensive”

Allergies12%

“Caused irritation”

Pain Relief-Overall9%

“Painful”

Size-Overall5%

“this time its a little bigger”

Thickness3%

“Very thick”

Itch Relief3%

“About a week ago, however, I found myself a bit more itchy and irritated than usual”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“You arent allowed to return these even though the product description sucks”

Ease Of Use2%

“Hard to use”

Inflammation2%

“I noticed the swelling started to reduce within 3–4 days”

Top return reasons

Salt Content26%
Functionality-Overall18%
Advertised Vs Actual Product13%
Ease Of Use6%
Value For Money6%
Ingredients-Overall6%
Smell6%
Moist/Dry4%
Certifications3%
Instructions/User Manual/Troubleshooting3%