Skip to content
51

easy protein shots

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.2%), but soft demand (-66.7% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 28Growth 0Conversion 51Competition 51Returns 99Price range 60Avg price 95Brand share 39Review moat 72Quality gap 94

Returns

Incredible0.2%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Avg price

Incredible$40.89

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.0★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Good602.92

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Price range

Good$15.75–$155.23

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Conversion

Good4.1%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Good54%

top-5 click share — leaders hold, buyers still browse

Brand share

Okay82%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$122K

$122K/yr · 74K searches

Growth

Bad-66.7%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

The top 5 products take 54% of clicks — established leaders, but buyers still shop beyond them.

Brands

15 rising

Sellers

30

Top-5 brand share

82%

Open market

14%

  • FUELMATE32%
  • BariatricPal19%
  • Frog Fuel18%
  • ProT Gold8%
  • ANATOPEAK5%
  • LiquaCel4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (9 brands, 14%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%5%$6K10%$12K15%$18K20%$24K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 25 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 25 weeks — -66.7% search growth over the last 90 days.
4K3KSpike '26Jan '26Feb '26Mar '26Apr '26May '26Jun '26

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall21%

“Doesn't taste terrible”

Nutritional Content20%

“Good amount of protein”

Flavor10%

“The flavor is mild”

Quality-Overall5%

“EXCELLENT PRODUCT”

Ease Of Use5%

“Easy to Take”

Value For Money2%

“Great value for the money”

Solubility2%

“It mixes easily with water”

Sweetness2%

“another awesome thing about these product is that is Sugar free”

Portability1%

“Easy to carry”

Blend/Ratio1%

“They blend up easily”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall27%

“Awful taste”

Flavor6%

“Flavor is terrible”

Nutritional Content6%

“No protein in these”

Value For Money4%

“Not worth it”

Solubility3%

“Won't dissolve”

Sweetness3%

“way too sugary”

Sour3%

“Extremely sour”

Texture/Consistency-Overall2%

“resulting in an unpleasant texture”

Artificial Sweeteners1%

“added artificial sweetners to it”

Bitter1%

“slightly bitter”

Top return reasons

Taste-Overall30%
Flavor14%
Leak-Proof9%
Nutritional Content8%
Advertised Vs Actual Product5%
Ingredients-Overall4%
Solubility3%
Smell3%
Contamination3%
Stale/Rotten/Spoiled2%