Skip to content
54

eargasm earplugs

Worth a look

Shows a sweet-spot price point ($34.13 avg), but a concentrated shelf (top 5 take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 83Growth 68Conversion 81Competition 0Returns 77Price range 93Avg price 95Brand share 0Review moat 18Quality gap 50

Avg price

Incredible$34.13

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Great$14.24–$47.25

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Market size

Great$1.3M

$1.3M/yr · 463K searches

Conversion

Great8.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Returns

Great1.9%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Growth

Good+49.2%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Good4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Review moat

Bad16,111.25

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad100%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 100% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

3 flat

Sellers

6

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Eargasm88%
  • Hearprotek7%
  • Loop5%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%20%$266K40%$531K60%$797K80%$1.1M10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 4 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +49.2% search growth over the last 90 days.
13K8KPrime Day '24Spike '24Spike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.9×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Size-Overall15%

“luckily they fit snuggly”

Comfort-Overall12%

“Comfortable”

Ear Hygiene10%

“Protect your ears”

Value For Money9%

“Good for the price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product8%

“Accurate description by the seller”

Quality-Overall7%

“The are well built”

Ease Of Use6%

“Easy to use”

Efficiency4%

“function very well”

Protection4%

“Great ear protection”

Durability3%

“I enjoy the durable case that it comes with to prevent me from losing them”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall19%

“too big”

Functionality-Overall12%

“Dosent work”

Value For Money11%

“Not worth the price”

Ease Of Use8%

“seems a bit cumbersome to use”

Comfort-Overall5%

“which was very uncomfortable”

Quality-Overall5%

“greatly reduce quality”

Pain Relief-Overall5%

“made my ears sore for hours afterward”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Not as advertised”

Durability2%

“Rip off”

Allergies2%

“ITCHY”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall44%
Functionality-Overall13%
Advertised Vs Actual Product10%
Comfort-Overall10%
Value For Money7%
Quality-Overall4%
Product Condition2%
Color2%
Filtration1%
Pain Relief-Overall1%