Skip to content
54

e cigarettes/vapes

Worth a look

Shows beatable incumbent ratings (3.4★), but soft demand (-18.3% this quarter) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 27Growth 16Conversion 20Competition 75Returns 81Price range 72Avg price 85Brand share 52Review moat 68Quality gap 100

Quality gap

Incredible3.4★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Great$18.88

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Returns

Great1.7%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Competition

Great40%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Price range

Good$5.34–$39.71

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Review moat

Good797

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Good74%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Market size

Okay$115K

$115K/yr · 386K searches

Conversion

Bad1.6%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Growth

Bad-18.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (40% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

17 rising

Sellers

74

Top-5 brand share

74%

Open market

21%

  • QuitGo40%
  • VAPE VAC11%
  • Heabal11%
  • cigtrus6%
  • STEP6%
  • Honeyrose5%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%4%$5K8%$9K12%$14K16%$18K1101001K10K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 39 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -18.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
7K5KPrime Day '25Spike '25Holiday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.6×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Taste-Overall9%

“Love taste”

Ease Of Use9%

“a handy little item to keep around for everyday use”

Value For Money8%

“Good price”

Quality-Overall8%

“the build quality is solid”

Smell7%

“The scent is light”

Flavor6%

“the variety of flavors”

Efficiency5%

“Effective”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Works as advertised”

Oral Hygiene3%

“Great for the hand to mouth habit”

Size-Overall2%

“I liked the size”

What buyers complain about

Taste-Overall17%

“Burnt taste”

Value For Money13%

“Very overpriced”

Functionality-Overall8%

“Didn't work”

Flavor8%

“In fact, it had a weird flavor thats kinda difficult to describe”

Smell7%

“Bad smell”

Quality-Overall6%

“Piece of garbage”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“NOT AS ADVERTISED”

Durability2%

“Kinda fall apart”

Jamming/Clogging2%

“Mine began to clog up fairly quickly”

Size-Overall2%

“A bit shorter than I would like too”

Top return reasons

Advertised Vs Actual Product16%
Functionality-Overall15%
Flavor9%
Smell9%
Taste-Overall9%
Size-Overall5%
Breathability5%
Waist Fit2%
Filtration2%
Ingredients-Overall2%