Skip to content
37

dry ice for drinks

Skip it

Weak search conversion (0.7%) — this niche doesn't clear our bar today.

Market size 13Growth 11Conversion 9Competition 23Returns 54Price range 64Avg price 95Brand share 48Review moat 42Quality gap 84

Avg price

Incredible$27.92

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Quality gap

Great4.2★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Price range

Good$8.80–$141.93

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Returns

Good2.8%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Brand share

Okay76%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Review moat

Okay2,273.06

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad72%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Market size

Bad$51K

$51K/yr · 244K searches

Growth

Bad-28.5%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Conversion

Bad0.7%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

The top 5 products capture 72% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

14 falling

Sellers

21

Top-5 brand share

76%

Open market

18%

  • Arctic Hayes26%
  • Chrome Cherry18%
  • Praxair14%
  • Akeydeco12%
  • LUNA ICE6%
  • WORLD-BIO6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$5K20%$10K30%$15K40%$20K101001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 16 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -28.5% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KSpike '24Spike '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Sep, Oct, Nov · busiest ÷ quietest = 10.3×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Quality-Overall16%

“Good quality”

Ease Of Use16%

“Easy to use”

Advertised Vs Actual Product10%

“Worked as advertised”

Value For Money6%

“Great affordable option”

Temperature Retention6%

“they stayed cold”

Durability5%

“Its durable”

Size-Overall5%

“Perfect size”

Portability3%

“Traveling”

Compactness2%

“Affordable compact and effective”

Efficiency2%

“Works well”

What buyers complain about

Size-Overall18%

“Smaller bag than expected”

Durability15%

“Lasted less than a week”

Quality-Overall13%

“Not good quality”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Returning this, the images are so deceiving, these are tiny and they need to be soaked overnight before use”

Taste-Overall6%

“Just ok, they taste a little off to me”

Heating5%

“It worked one day and then started overheating and stopped working”

Functionality-Overall3%

“Tried cleaning with vinegar and still nothing”

Warmth2%

“Everything in the box was cold”

Strength2%

“WEAK”

Value For Money2%

“Too expensive for quantity”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall43%
Advertised Vs Actual Product19%
Functionality-Overall15%
Value For Money2%
Leak-Proof2%
Defective Material/Parts2%
Heating1%
Quality-Overall1%
Durability1%
Moist/Dry1%