Skip to content
50

dish wand

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.4%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 100% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 76Growth 37Conversion 91Competition 24Returns 98Price range 0Avg price 40Brand share 0Review moat 25Quality gap 68

Returns

Incredible0.4%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Great11.0%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Market size

Great$924K

$924K/yr · 776K searches

Quality gap

Good4.3★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay$10.86

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Growth

Okay+9.6%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Review moat

Bad4,641.13

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Competition

Bad71%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Brand share

Bad100%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Price range

Bad$3.24–$14.91

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

The top 5 products capture 71% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

5 falling

Sellers

60

Top-5 brand share

100%

Open market

0%

  • Scotch-Brite83%
  • HELIME9%
  • MR.SIGA3%
  • 3M3%
  • Dawn2%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$92K20%$185K30%$277K40%$370K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 15 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +9.6% search growth over the last 90 days.
18K13KSpike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Cleaning21%

“Cleans great”

Quality-Overall12%

“Excellent product”

Ease Of Use9%

“easy to replace”

Value For Money8%

“Awesome price”

Advertised Vs Actual Product5%

“Just as advertised”

Leak-Proof5%

“No leaks yet”

Efficiency3%

“Works well”

Washability3%

“works well to wash”

Durability2%

“The sponge is durable”

Dispensing Mechanism2%

“Easy to fill up the soap dispenser”

What buyers complain about

Leak-Proof31%

“Leaked again”

Ease Of Cleaning9%

“not an easy thing to clean up”

Durability6%

“broke after a month”

Quality-Overall5%

“Absolute garbage”

Dispensing Mechanism4%

“Does NOT dispense soap”

Design-Overall3%

“The design itself is defective”

Size-Overall3%

“Small”

Advertised Vs Actual Product2%

“Not as described”

Functionality-Overall2%

“Does not work”

Smell2%

“Nasty Smell”

Top return reasons

Leak-Proof17%
Advertised Vs Actual Product17%
Size-Overall15%
Dispensing Mechanism7%
Functionality-Overall6%
Value For Money4%
Quality-Overall4%
Scratch Resistance3%
Product Condition3%
Touch/Button Controls2%