Skip to content
62

dish brush

Worth a look

Shows a $5.3M/yr market, but a failed launch gate (market size, growth, or returns) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 98Growth 19Conversion 95Competition 81Returns 98Price range 14Avg price 32Brand share 59Review moat 22Quality gap 33

Market size

Incredible$5.3M

$5.3M/yr · 4.3M searches

Returns

Incredible0.3%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Conversion

Incredible12.5%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Competition

Great34%

top-5 click share — an open shelf

Brand share

Good70%

top-5 brand share — brands hold most of the demand

Quality gap

Okay4.5★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Avg price

Okay$9.81

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Review moat

Bad9,292.85

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Growth

Bad-11.4%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Price range

Bad$2.48–$16.98

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Competition

Clicks spread well past the top 5 (34% combined) — an open shelf where new products get seen.

Brands

21 falling

Sellers

630

Top-5 brand share

70%

Open market

24%

  • MR.SIGA18%
  • Holikme16%
  • SetSail13%
  • Scotch-Brite12%
  • OXO11%
  • Amazer6%

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%3%$159K6%$318K9%$478K12%$637K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 48 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — -11.4% search growth over the last 90 days.
100K60KSpike '25Prime Day '25Black Friday '25Spike '26SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

Peak months: Jan · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.4×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Ease Of Cleaning20%

“Great for Cleaning”

Quality-Overall14%

“Excellent Product”

Value For Money10%

“Very affordable”

Durability8%

“The material is sturdy and durable”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Better than I expected”

Ease Of Use5%

“EASY to use”

Efficiency4%

“Brush worked well”

Strength4%

“the construction is sturdy”

Size-Overall3%

“Fits well in your hand”

Scratch Resistance2%

“Doesn't scratch”

What buyers complain about

Durability15%

“broke quickly”

Quality-Overall10%

“Lacks in quality”

Leak-Proof10%

“Leaked”

Ease Of Cleaning9%

“Can't clean much with this”

Value For Money4%

“Definitely not worth the price”

Hard Feel4%

“They are tough”

Size-Overall4%

“Too small”

Smell3%

“Terrible odor”

Dispensing Mechanism3%

“Soap dispenser doesnt work”

Strength2%

“Not strong”

Top return reasons

Size-Overall23%
Advertised Vs Actual Product12%
Value For Money11%
Material Quality7%
Quality-Overall5%
Hard Feel5%
Dispensing Mechanism4%
Leak-Proof3%
Functionality-Overall3%
Defective Material/Parts3%