Skip to content
54

diclofenac sodium topical gel

Worth a look

Shows low returns (0.0%), but brand-locked demand (top 5 brands take 96% of clicks) keeps it on the watch list.

Market size 94Growth 39Conversion 93Competition 22Returns 100Price range 71Avg price 77Brand share 10Review moat 20Quality gap 24

Returns

Incredible0.0%

return rate — above 6% kills the launch gate

Market size

Great$1.9M

$1.9M/yr · 1.1M searches

Conversion

Great11.4%

search→purchase rate — share of searches ending in a sale

Avg price

Great$15.69

avg listing price — sweet spot $15–$100

Price range

Good$8.32–$31.10

cheapest to priciest tracked listing — scored on the share inside $15–$100

Growth

Okay+11.3%

90-day search growth — must beat 0% to launch

Quality gap

Bad4.6★

avg incumbent rating — lower means beatable quality

Competition

Bad74%

top-5 click share — a locked-up shelf

Review moat

Bad12,789.14

avg incumbent reviews — the moat a new listing must climb

Brand share

Bad96%

top-5 brand share — brand-locked demand

Competition

The top 5 products capture 74% of clicks — a locked-up shelf that new listings rarely crack.

Brands

6 falling

Sellers

56

Top-5 brand share

96%

Open market

0%

  • HealthCareAisle40%
  • Amazon Basic Care30%
  • Voltaren16%
  • C'rcle5%
  • GeriCare5%
  • Curist4%
  • Open — no brand owns it (0%)

Product shelf

Each bubble is one product — market share against review moat; bubble size tracks estimated sales, color grades how beatable the incumbent looks.

0%10%$193K20%$386K30%$580K40%$773K1001K10K100K Reviews — right = deep review moat Market share (90d) ≈ est. sales
Beatable (≤4.3★) Contested Strong incumbent (>4.7★)

All 14 tracked products in this niche — three views at once, no toggling.

Demand & seasonality

Weekly Amazon search volume, last 104 weeks — +11.3% search growth over the last 90 days.
25K15KSpike '24SepDecMarJunAugNovMarMay

No pronounced peak months · busiest ÷ quietest = 1.2×

Reviews

What buyers praise and complain about, mined from review topics.

What buyers love

Value For Money17%

“Affordable Price”

Joint Pain16%

“Helps with knee pain”

Efficiency16%

“WORKS AS ADVERTISED”

Quality-Overall13%

“As good as name brand”

Advertised Vs Actual Product7%

“Exactly as advertised”

Smell4%

“has no bad smells”

Muscle Pain Relief3%

“Great for muscle pain”

Ease Of Use2%

“Easy to use”

Ease Of Application2%

“it feels cool when applied”

Absorbency1%

“This stuff actually does absorb in”

What buyers complain about

Pain Relief-Overall19%

“Doesnt provide enough pain, relief”

Functionality-Overall14%

“Didn't work for me”

Value For Money9%

“Crazy expensive”

Joint Pain6%

“This didn't really help with the arthritis in my knee”

Smell6%

“Terrible smell”

Size-Overall3%

“the tube is too big”

Advertised Vs Actual Product3%

“Misleading picture”

Ease Of Use2%

“Can't anything be easy”

Side Effects2%

“Too much side effects”

Dosage2%

“it's ok I wish the dose was stronger”

Top return reasons

Joint Pain50%
Value For Money50%